Golfers Wiki » golf shoes » Tiger = POY

Tiger = POY

Question:

#1 target of little dick white guys.

#1 With racist black trash.

Response:

#1 in swearing #1 in moping when behind #1 in slamming clubs in the ground when behind

#1 for being on camera when such things happen.    But do you have any idea who behaves such without the camera there

Response:

On  [GMT+0100=CET], #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice My source list Davis Love III as number 1 in money. Danny But Tiger is #1 in money/event, which is all that really counts…. Tiger doesn’t pad his money with 2nd tier events like DL3 and Vijay

Mason Verger: LOL!! U had me actually laughing out loud! Mason Verger, the ugly lil freak from Hannibal…your e-mail address had me falling out of my chair….!

Response:

#1 in swearing #1 in moping when behind #1 in slamming clubs in the ground when behind …

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

#1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins              - Tied with Davis Love III #1 in total money    - #2 behind Davis Love III

Tied for #5 in majors won (with Davis Love III and most of the other contenders). yeah, it’s easy choice

Not quite as easy when you look more closely.   Let’s wait until the season’s over to decide.

Response:

Not a chance. Those who vote for POY (whose ballots actually count) always give deference to those who’ve won majors. See 1996. Randy Voiceovers for commercials, industrial narrations, training videos, corporate "on-hold" messaging, radio and TV station imaging, etc. Audio and video production.  www.brownmedia.net Preserve your life story for your children, grandchildren and future generations of your family with a Video Biography.  See what it’s all about at www.YourVideoBio.com.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

The old invent a new number when my number turns out to be bullshit trick. Nice try.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – On  [GMT+0100=CET], #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice My source list Davis Love III as number 1 in money. Danny But Tiger is #1 in money/event, which is all that really counts…. Tiger doesn’t pad his money with 2nd tier events like DL3 and Vijay

Response:

<< But Tiger is #1 in money/event, which is all that really counts….   Really?  I never knew that. Best, Ken

Response:

Only way Tiger should get POY is with a win at this weeks tournament which will vault him to number one on the money list and most wins for the year. Out side of that Weir or Furyk would be POY

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

Hahahahaha!!!!   That bald-headed Canadian bitch !!! He’s too boring to be player of the year.

since when has tiger become "mr excitment"

Response:

I agree…if he gets at least one more win (preferably the Tour Champ.), and Weir or Furyk does not, he has to get it.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Only way Tiger should get POY is with a win at this weeks tournament which will vault him to number one on the money list and most wins for the year. Out side of that Weir or Furyk would be POY #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

As tiresome and obnoxious as this SLUMP talk is, Weir would be my pick at this point, Major winners get the nod, all things being even.  Weir has also, all in all played better in the other Majors then Tiger. Tiger is still the best player in the world, but Weir has had the better year to this point. Now, if Tiger or Love or Furyk get hot the remainder of the year and put up some wins while Weir doesn’t, then I reserve the right to change my opinion.

Response:

I agree…if he gets at least one more win (preferably the Tour Champ.), and Weir or Furyk does not, he has to get it.

What if Davis Love III wins more instead?

Response:

#1 target of little dick white guys. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in throwing his clubs #1 in getting annoyed at the gallery if they sneeze #1 in freezing on his down swing after aforementioned sneeze #1 in acting like he’s owed a major win! #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice Tied for last in number of majors won. You can’t be POY if you can’t win one of the big ones. Flame away. Kenny — Kenny Stultz – Troll and SPAM intolerant RSG Rollcall: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=stultzk "Golf is the only sport where a precise knowledge of the Rules can earn one a reputation for poor sportsmanship"

Response:

Hahahahaha!!!!   That bald-headed Canadian bitch !!! He’s too boring to be player of the year. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No majors. I would vote for Mike Weir. Especially if he can win the World Series or the Tour Championship. Ken #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

#1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

My source list Davis Love III as number 1 in money. Danny

Response:

as does espn, pgatour and just about any other legitimate sports reporting service

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice My source list Davis Love III as number 1 in money. Danny

Response:

I doubt even Tiger would vote for himself right now…and he is prone to give himself the benefit of the doubt…

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

On  [GMT+0100=CET], #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice My source list Davis Love III as number 1 in money. Danny

But Tiger is #1 in money/event, which is all that really counts…. Tiger doesn’t pad his money with 2nd tier events like DL3 and Vijay

Response:

#1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice Tied for last in number of majors won. You can’t be POY if you can’t win one of the big ones. Flame away.

No, I agree with you, totally.  So far, Weirsy is the man for this award, IMHO.  Furyk’s close behind in second.  But if the choice was between TW, Curtis and Micheel, then I’d choose TW among those three.

Response:

No majors. I would vote for Mike Weir. Especially if he can win the World Series or the Tour Championship. Ken – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

#1 in throwing his clubs #1 in getting annoyed at the gallery if they sneeze #1 in freezing on his down swing after aforementioned sneeze #1 in acting like he’s owed a major win!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice Tied for last in number of majors won. You can’t be POY if you can’t win one of the big ones. Flame away. Kenny — Kenny Stultz – Troll and SPAM intolerant RSG Rollcall: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=stultzk "Golf is the only sport where a precise knowledge of the Rules can earn one a reputation for poor sportsmanship"

Response:

#1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

I totally agree.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – #1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Response:

#1 in money/event #1 in scoring #1 in wins #1 in total money yeah, it’s easy choice

Tied for last in number of majors won. You can’t be POY if you can’t win one of the big ones. Flame away. Kenny — Kenny Stultz – Troll and SPAM intolerant RSG Rollcall: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=stultzk "Golf is the only sport where a precise knowledge of the Rules can earn one a reputation for poor sportsmanship"

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Woods and Watson on their respective Tours. Hard to argue either choice; however, in each case, there were runners-up that certainly could have just as easily taken the honor. Tiger Woods is a force on the Tour for a number of reasons that the other players just don’t seem to possess. Yes, I’m going back a year or two now, but can you honestly say that fellow professionals would express the same "awe" in respect to Furyk, Singh or Love III? I don’t think so. Although Vijay had a great year, there just doesn’t seem to be the same … I don’t know … that there is with Tiger. My personal opinon? His coach and his equipment let him down this year. I truly feel he needs to get both back in order. Larry

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

For the Tiger doubters, consider that Singh, Weir, Love and Furyk just had their best year of their careers. Woods had his worst since 1998…and it became a toss-up for POY. Bruce                   Bruce E. Newman  *  Fredericton, NB, Canada                                 http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=newmanb              info at brucenewman dot com  *  http://brucenewman.com

Response:

Money title is not as prestigious as Vardon, 4 wins not as good as five wins (or at least not in the South).  Neither had a major (also Love had 4 wins but no major)   If  Weir or Furyk had won 3 additional tourneys, I believe they would have been POY. Paul

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just announced on ESPN. Discuss For the Tiger doubters, consider that Singh, Weir, Love and Furyk just had their best year of their careers. Woods had his worst since 1998…and it became a toss-up for POY. Bruce                   Bruce E. Newman  *  Fredericton, NB, Canada               http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=newmanb              info at brucenewman dot com  *  http://brucenewman.com

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Is this like a take home test? Don’t you have an opinion? At least it was close, USA Today reports that three un-named sources claimed it was the closest vote since 98. Still, I don’t think there’s any surprise here. My take is that Tiger won due to several factors. #1, He’s Tiger the media star, damn good golfer, role model and bankable corporate citizen. In other words he won as much for what he’s done off the course as on it. #2 Tiger played fewer tournaments than Singh and missed money title by slim margin. #3 Singh didn’t win a major either #4 Earnie Els was in the playoff versus Tiger, not VJ. But what the hell do I know, I don’t know anybody who voted. I imagine by now the PGA guys think they need a damn good reason not to vote for Tiger. VJ’s year, as good as it was, wasn’t good enough.

Response:

@news1.news.adelphia.net: Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Nice to see that Vijay’s desperate grab for the money title was dismissed by his peers.  The POY should be awarded based on excellence.  It should not go to someone looking to pad his bank account. Tiger was teh best player by far in ‘03.  Hats off to him.

Response:

I’m stunned. And I guess I owe someone a steak dinner. Methinks the other players just didn’t want to piss him off thereby prompting him to actually start tearing himself away from Elin long enough to start practicing again. Randy

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

Response:

That’s a great point, Bruce. If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY.  The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess. Randy

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just announced on ESPN. Discuss For the Tiger doubters, consider that Singh, Weir, Love and Furyk just had their best year of their careers. Woods had his worst since 1998…and it became a toss-up for POY. Bruce                   Bruce E. Newman  *  Fredericton, NB, Canada               http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=newmanb              info at brucenewman dot com  *  http://brucenewman.com

Response:

If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY.  The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess.

What makes you think ‘01-’02 is a level Tiger can "roar back" to? I think Tiger can obviously continue playing some fantastic golf, and will win plenty more events and majors. But our expectations may be getting somewhat ridiculous. It might have been as good as it gets. — Cheers Colin Wilson RSG Roll Call: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=wilsonc Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY.  The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess. What makes you think ‘01-’02 is a level Tiger can "roar back" to? I think Tiger can obviously continue playing some fantastic golf, and will win plenty more events and majors. But our expectations may be getting somewhat ridiculous. It might have been as good as it gets.

Fortunately for the rest of us golf lovers, Tiger doesn’t share your mentality.   That probably explains why he’s a legend and you’re a walking turd.

Response:

: That’s a great point, Bruce. : : If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything : to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else : a chance in ‘04. I think that Tiger is breaking down physically.  The nagging little injuries, after playing so much golf since he was a little boy, seem to be coming more frequently now. What we’re going to see now is how great he can be mentally if I’m right.  But we’ll not see anything like 2000 again. cb

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY.  The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess. What makes you think ‘01-’02 is a level Tiger can "roar back" to? I think Tiger can obviously continue playing some fantastic golf, and will win plenty more events and majors. But our expectations may be getting somewhat ridiculous. It might have been as good as it gets. Fortunately for the rest of us golf lovers, Tiger doesn’t share your mentality.   That probably explains why he’s a legend and you’re a walking turd.

Actually Colin’s post was correct. Tiger has lifted the bar so high by his dramatic achievements that even he may have a difficult time living up to his past sucess. Colin points out that *our* expectations may be difficult for Tiger to create. 2003 is an example. His results were great, but not up to past standards he set. Funny how rational comments bring out the low life shit from the fringe.

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss

This is the first year that I have really become involved with the professional players and the pro tournaments….all because I went to the TPC here at Ponte Verde last spring. I honestly have not enjoyed Tiger all that much. He seems like a petulant little boy. While there were no real individual standouts, his comments aside, I think Vijay was probably one of the most enjoyable players to watch. Tom Watson on the Senior tour wins hands down but Craig Stadler was an enjoyment to see too. I guess if POY means Best POY then it would have to go to Tiger. Although if it is just POY I’d have to give it to Vijay, I don’t think anyone expected him to have the kind of year he had. Just my thoughts. Sheila

Response:

I didn’t say he would, could or will.  I say "maybe he might." IF he rededicates himself.  It’s a bit unfair of me to even imply that he wasn’t as dedicated in ‘03, as Mr. Woods had not been clearing his practice itinerary with me for most of the year.  A five-win year is a career season for most players, but I think even Tiger would admit it was disappointing from the standpoint of his not contending at any of the majors after he sent that wayward tee shot on #3 on Sunday at The Masters into never-never land. (How quickly we forget that he was, in fact, very much in the hunt until that rather uncharacteristic course management mistake.) Tiger has said, as Jack had said years earlier, that the key to winning majors is just getting your game to peak at the right time.  As every player who’s ever lived has found, that’s easier said than done.  It appeared for a few years that Tiger had figured out how to turn the switch to "on."  But of course in ‘03, we learned he is human, after all. Whether or not his drop-off in majors this year was symptomatic of any bigger problem (distracted by Elin?  not seeing Butch as regularly?  too many Buick commercials?), well, none of us is in a position to say with certainty.  It’s all speculation, and 19th hole fodder. But as Bruce Newman said elsewhere, it’s interesting to note that Tiger’s peers viewed him as the best player overall in ‘03, DESPITE his failures in the majors and the fact that he had, for him, a disappointing year while others like Weir and Singh had their best years ever.  That speaks volumes about Tiger’s talent.  The players know. Very simply put, Tiger Woods remains the most explosive player on the PGA TOUR.  That doesn’t mean he’ll win everytime he laces up his golf shoes. But it does mean that his peers believe he’s the man to beat whenever they all meet at the starting gate. As for whether Tiger can "roar back" to the level he was at in ‘01-’02, who knows?  ’99 wouldn’t be a bad place for him to roar back to.  One major, 8 wins overall.  It’s funny how such a thing would seem far-fetched for any other player but him.  But since he’s done that before, and then topped it more than once, he’s raised a level of expectation.  Unreasonable, perhaps, but it’s there. Randy

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY. The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess. What makes you think ‘01-’02 is a level Tiger can "roar back" to? I think Tiger can obviously continue playing some fantastic golf, and will win plenty more events and majors. But our expectations may be getting somewhat ridiculous. It might have been as good as it gets. — Cheers Colin Wilson RSG Roll Call: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=wilsonc Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com

Response:

: That’s a great point, Bruce. : : If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything : to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else : a chance in ‘04. I think that Tiger is breaking down physically.  The nagging little injuries, after playing so much golf since he was a little boy, seem to be coming more frequently now. What we’re going to see now is how great he can be mentally if I’m right.  But we’ll not see anything like 2000 again.

We’d never seen anything like it before.  Why would we think we’d see something like it again? Like Haley’s Comet.  If you blinked, you missed it. The difference, I suppose, is that unlike Johnny Miller, who burned white hot for a short period, Tiger has already shown more staying power.  Whether or not he burns out sooner than some remains to be seen.  One can only assume that if Tiger really wanted to beef up his win total, he could pretty easily start showing up at all the Fruit of the Loom Boxer Shorts Open tournaments, instead of focusing solely on the majors, the elite field events and the second-tier TOUR events like Memorial, Bay Hill, etc.  Just ask Vijay Singh about whether entering a few extra tournaments can bolster one’s standing on the money list and pick up a few wins.  I just don’t see Tiger doing that. If he’s burning out, as you say, he’ll burn out playing 16-19 events a year. Hard to imagine him burning out at that pace. Randy

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If Tiger actually rededicates himself (not that a 5-win season is anything to sneeze at, mind you), he might come roaring back and not give anyone else a chance in ‘04. Truth be told, a 5-win season is usually plenty good enough to win POY.  The only reason some of us doubted he’d win is because he didn’t live up to the high standards HE had set.  Silly in hindsight, I guess. What makes you think ‘01-’02 is a level Tiger can "roar back" to? I think Tiger can obviously continue playing some fantastic golf, and will win plenty more events and majors. But our expectations may be getting somewhat ridiculous. It might have been as good as it gets. Fortunately for the rest of us golf lovers, Tiger doesn’t share your mentality.   That probably explains why he’s a legend and you’re a walking turd. Actually Colin’s post was correct. Tiger has lifted the bar so high by his dramatic achievements that even he may have a difficult time living up to his past sucess. Colin points out that *our* expectations may be difficult for Tiger to create. 2003 is an example. His results were great, but not up to past standards he set. Funny how rational comments bring out the low life shit from the fringe.

Colin’s post was right, if you’re a moron. Tiger continues to dominate like no other golfer in history.  So he didn’t win 3 majors.  He will next year. Suck it nice and easy.

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss This is the first year that I have really become involved with the professional players and the pro tournaments….all because I went to the TPC here at Ponte Verde last spring. I honestly have not enjoyed Tiger all that much. He seems like a petulant little boy.

You would be too if you had a million nerds named Sheila bugging you all day long.  It’s a wonder he doesn’t bitchslap more people. While there were no real individual standouts, his comments aside, I think Vijay was probably one of the most enjoyable players to watch. Tom Watson on the Senior tour wins hands down but Craig Stadler was an enjoyment to see too. I guess if POY means Best POY then it would have to go to Tiger. Although if it is just POY I’d have to give it to Vijay, I don’t think anyone expected him to have the kind of year he had. Just my thoughts.

Thanks for your thoughts.  Thankfully the PGA players have more going on upstairs.

Response:

: If he’s burning out, as you say, he’ll burn out playing 16-19 events a year. : Hard to imagine him burning out at that pace. I don’t think he’s burning out, though.  I think he’s breaking down. And there is an ever-emerging generation of long-bombing upstarts who will be able to challenge his length and shotmaking. I could be wrong.  I just have this intuition that the glory years are pretty much over already. cb

Response:

Whether or not his drop-off in majors this year was symptomatic of any bigger problem (distracted by Elin?  not seeing Butch as regularly?  too many Buick commercials?), well, none of us is in a position to say with certainty.  It’s all speculation, and 19th hole fodder.

That’s true of course. In favour of Tiger repeating 01-02 at some stage is: 1. He’s Tiger Woods. 2. Despite what everyone says, a marriage/permanent relationship might be a positive, not a distraction. It certainly has been for players I am familiar with, like Robert Allenby and Stuart Appleby. 3. Most players are at their best in their thirties. 4. His explosiveness could easily be replaced by greater experience and other more highly developed skills. Against Tiger getting back to those heady levels is: 1. He’s lost some of his huge advantage in power and length. Other players have caught up, the competition is stronger. 2. He’s getting a few niggly injuries that weren’t present before. 3. As a contra to 3. above, he’s getting older and therefore less explosive. 4. Every player seems to have a "window" in which they play their best-possible golf. For some it’s only a couple of years. For some it’s a decade. Few do it for a whole career. Even Jack had a 6-year period where he won 30 of his 70 or so USPGA tournaments; Sam Snead had two such periods, lasting about six years each, in which he won 57 of his 82. Tom Watson’s and Arnold Palmer’s windows actually only lasted about 7 years each in total. Tiger’s has been going on for seven years now (but he could be the exception). 5. Maybe the "will" to achieve at that level again just won’t be obtainable. I guess we’ll know next year. ;-) — Cheers Colin Wilson RSG Roll Call: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=wilsonc Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com

Response:

Halley’s comet took much longer than a blink of an eye to cross the sky. We’d never seen anything like it before.  Why would we think we’d see something like it again? Like Haley’s Comet.  If you blinked, you missed it.

<snip

Response:

Just announced on ESPN. Discuss Is this like a take home test? Don’t you have an opinion?

Even though I don’t post here on a regular basis, my feeling all along was that Tiger would win/deserved it.  That’s all I got, nothing earth shattering to me about him winning it again. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – At least it was close, USA Today reports that three un-named sources claimed it was the closest vote since 98. Still, I don’t think there’s any surprise here. My take is that Tiger won due to several factors. #1, He’s Tiger the media star, damn good golfer, role model and bankable corporate citizen. In other words he won as much for what he’s done off the course as on it. #2 Tiger played fewer tournaments than Singh and missed money title by slim margin. #3 Singh didn’t win a major either #4 Earnie Els was in the playoff versus Tiger, not VJ. But what the hell do I know, I don’t know anybody who voted. I imagine by now the PGA guys think they need a damn good reason not to vote for Tiger. VJ’s year, as good as it was, wasn’t good enough.

Response:

: If he’s burning out, as you say, he’ll burn out playing 16-19 events a year. : Hard to imagine him burning out at that pace. I don’t think he’s burning out, though.  I think he’s breaking down. And there is an ever-emerging generation of long-bombing upstarts who will be able to challenge his length and shotmaking. I could be wrong.  I just have this intuition that the glory years are pretty much over already. cb

The average age of TOUR winners is in the 30’s.  PGA TOUR pros seem to mature in their 30’s and play their best golf.  Tiger has yet to even reach his glory years.  His experience will be a huge asset as he gets older. Some people hope that Tiger will fizzle out.  Not me.  I just continue to enjoy watching him play out of this world. tim

Response:

: :

: : : : If he’s burning out, as you say, he’ll burn out playing 16-19 events a year. : : Hard to imagine him burning out at that pace. : : I don’t think he’s burning out, though.  I think he’s breaking down. : And there is an ever-emerging generation of long-bombing upstarts who : will be able to challenge his length and shotmaking. : : I could be wrong.  I just have this intuition that the glory years : are pretty much over already. : : The average age of TOUR winners is in the 30’s.  PGA TOUR pros seem to mature in : their 30’s and play their best golf. Most PGA Tour pros haven’t been playing golf constantly since the age of 3. : Tiger has yet to even reach his glory : years.  His experience will be a huge asset as he gets older. I agree with you there.  He will still win because of his great mind for the game, even as his physical skills diminish.  (Just like Nicklaus.)  But I think the days of seeing him win *and* make jaw-dropping shots are passing.  Not gone yet, but passing. : Some people hope that Tiger will fizzle out.  Not me.  I just : continue to enjoy watching him play out of this world. I think he’s a good guy with the best all-around game yet seen. I just also think that he’s played the same amount of golf as most 40 y/o pros.  That should give one pause. cb

Response:

I don’t think he’s burning out, though.  I think he’s breaking down. And there is an ever-emerging generation of long-bombing upstarts who will be able to challenge his length and shotmaking.

I know this might be heresy, but I think if anything he’s become a bit unsure of where he is with his swing. This year saw lots of times where he either pulled left or blocked right, and he seems a bit out of place sometimes with his hand/arm position vis-a-vis his body position. He needs to sort it out again. — Cheers Colin Wilson RSG Roll Call: http://rec-sport-golf.com/members/?rollcall=wilsonc Trentham Golf Club: http://www.trenthamgolf.com

Response:

Author: admin on
Category: golf shoes
Tags:

Related Posts

Leave a Reply