Question:
Mr. Colin Wilson stated: As a minor and inconsequential point on attribution in this case, Scott Williams did not write the above paragraph, I did. 
I for one recognize the fact that the afore mentioned paragraph was posted by Mr. Wilson. And I still recognize the fact that, that damn bag was still built by Belding 
-ss RSG roll call http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/shireys.htm
Response:
It would be hard to reference another newsgroup, I’d think, in a message. I’ve posted URLs before referring to images I wanted to make a point on, such as a diagram of clubface/ball direction as related to slice/hook, or pictures of our RSG event at Lawsonia. It seems to me to be the best solution, but for one thing: It doesn’t work if you don’t have access to a page where you can post it. But even then, it seems likely you could find a friend to put it on his/her site, and then reference it that way. Mike — Mike Dalecki I do not patronize spammers! Help keep R.S.G clean. I employ the same etiquette on RSG you’d expect from me on the golf course. RSG Roll Call: http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/daleckim.htm – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [Image] Please don’t post binaries (especially pics that are 160K!) … this is a text-only newsgroup. If you want someone to answer, place your picture on a web page somewhere and give us the url. Having discussed this with a couple group members by e-mail, I’m curious as to how the rest would respond to the idea of setting up an adjunct NG for binaries, such as alt.sport.golf.binaries or somesuch? The advantage of such a group would be that if someone has a question like the one that started this thread, he or she could post the pic there and refer to it here. Same thing for pics of different courses and holes, weird, awkward or funny lies, or pics from games with RSG members. A lot of the things we discuss here would be far less confusing with a pic or two. Other question is, how does one go about initiating a new NG? Haven’t done it before, and I’ve no idea of the correct procedure. Eliyahu
Response:
"Scott Shirey" wrote… [Image] Please don’t post binaries (especially pics that are 160K!) … this is a text-only newsgroup. If you want someone to answer, place your picture on a web page somewhere and give us the url.
As a minor and inconsequential point on attribution in this case, Scott Williams did not write the above paragraph, I did. Cheers Colin Wilson Australian handicap: 10.7 RSG Roll Call: http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/wilsonc.htm
Response:
[Image] Please don’t post binaries (especially pics that are 160K!) … this is a text-only newsgroup. If you want someone to answer, place your picture on a web page somewhere and give us the url.
Having discussed this with a couple group members by e-mail, I’m curious as to how the rest would respond to the idea of setting up an adjunct NG for binaries, such as alt.sport.golf.binaries or somesuch? The advantage of such a group would be that if someone has a question like the one that started this thread, he or she could post the pic there and refer to it here. Same thing for pics of different courses and holes, weird, awkward or funny lies, or pics from games with RSG members. A lot of the things we discuss here would be far less confusing with a pic or two. Other question is, how does one go about initiating a new NG? Haven’t done it before, and I’ve no idea of the correct procedure. Eliyahu
Response:
In theory I think it is a good idea. However, given the difficulty we have had so far in getting people to use alt.golf.forsale, I would have to suspect that it would not be effective. FYI, there is a binary golf group already, but I think it is intended for golf computer games. It is alt.binaries.games.golf. I don’t know what the regulars there would think about RSGers posting real golf binaries there though. Having discussed this with a couple group members by e-mail, I’m curious as to how the rest would respond to the idea of setting up an adjunct NG for binaries, such as alt.sport.golf.binaries or somesuch? The advantage of such a group would be that if someone has a question like the one that started this thread, he or she could post the pic there and refer to it here. Same thing for pics of different courses and holes, weird, awkward or funny lies, or pics from games with RSG members. A lot of the things we discuss here would be far less confusing with a pic or two. Other question is, how does one go about initiating a new NG? Haven’t done it before, and I’ve no idea of the correct procedure. Eliyahu
– Dan Driscoll Member USGA, NCGA RSG FAQ: http://ttsoft.com/thor/rsggolf.html RSG Roll Call http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/driscolld.htm
Response:
[Image]
Please don’t post binaries (especially pics that are 160K!) … this is a text-only newsgroup. If you want someone to answer, place your picture on a web page somewhere and give us the url. Cheers Colin Wilson Australian handicap: 10.7 RSG Roll Call: http://u1.netgate.net/~kirby34/rsg/wilsonc.htm
Response: